The Pathologist’s RCM Checklist Are Your Pathology Billing Systems Doing You Justice

The Pathologist’s RCM Checklist: Are Your Pathology Billing Systems Doing You Justice?

Your pathologists are diagnosing cancer. But your billing team? They’re diagnosing something else entirely: denials, underpayments, and revenue holes no one can seem to plug.

If that hits a little too close to home, you’re not alone.

We’ve worked with pathology labs across the U.S. – hospital-based, private groups, national reference labs – to know the symptoms: clean claims on paper but shrinking cash flow; pathology coding that looks fine until an audit hits; contract rates that haven’t changed in 5 years, but test complexity has doubled.

Before you hire another FTE or switch your pathology billing company again, run through this checklist. You’ll find out exactly where your pathology revenue cycle is bleeding – and how to fix it.

  1. Pathology Billing Services: Are You Getting Paid for Everything You Do?

Let’s be honest: pathology billing isn’t just billing. It’s a battlefield. 

If your medical billing partner isn’t a pathology billing company, they’re likely missing revenue opportunities you don’t even know exist.

Any of this sound familiar?

  • You’re billing Level 3s and 4s instead of 5s because it’s “safer”
  • Your team’s constantly cleaning up modifier messes (26, TC, 59, 91)
  • Reflex panels (IHC, FISH, NGS) aren’t billing downstream accurately
  • Tech/pro splits at hospital-based sites are inconsistent
  • You get clean claims… but collections are flatlining

3Gen Consulting’s pathology billing services use AI-powered claim scrubbing, modifier audits, test panel logic, and denial trend analysis to capture every reimbursable dollar while keeping you fully compliant.

  • Pathology Coding: Clean Claims Don’t Always Mean Correct

Let’s talk about the invisible revenue killer: pathology coding.

Pathology coding is one of the most overlooked revenue drains. Coders must go beyond basic CPT knowledge – they must understand stains, panels, molecular techniques, and payor nuances.

Ask yourself:

  • Are coders certified in pathology-specific coding?
  • Are they accurately coding for IHC, molecular, or genetic testing?
  • Is there QA in place to review coding before submission?
  • Is documentation of medical necessity being validated?

Even the cleanest billing process can’t save incomplete or inaccurate coding. If your team isn’t fluent in pathology coding nuance, you’re flying blind. With 3Gen’s team of certified pathology coders, clients achieve 95%+ accuracy, layered QA, audit-ready documentation, and real-time dashboards.

  • Payer Contracting: Are Your Rates Keeping Up With Test Complexity?

When’s the last time you renegotiated your payer contracts?

Most pathology groups haven’t touched their payer contracts in years. Meanwhile, payers tweak fee schedules, apply edits, and bundle services that should be billed separately.

Time to self-audit:

  • Have you renegotiated rates for molecular pathology?
  • Do your reimbursement rates align with MRF benchmark data?
  • Are just 2–3 poor-performing payers dragging down overall collections?
  • Have you tracked high-volume tests against peer lab payments?

Contracts are no longer “set and forget.” If you’re not renegotiating smarter and backing it up with data, you’re likely being underpaid for advanced pathology services. Our payer contracting team uses denial trends, test-level reimbursement data, and MRF benchmarking to arm you with hard facts to negotiate smarter.

  • Clinical Pathology Laboratories & Risk Adjustment: The New Revenue Frontier

Risk adjustment coding isn’t just for primary care. If your pathology lab serves Medicare Advantage or ACO populations, you’re sitting on untapped value. Pathology findings often uncover conditions that impact HCC coding and RAF scores – but most labs aren’t capturing them.

Here’s what to ask:

  • Are your coders flagging incidental findings like malignancies or chronic disease markers?
  • Do you have a system to track pathology-related HCC conditions?
  • Are your pathologists trained to document with risk adjustment in mind?

3Gen Consulting’s RiskGen-i platform integrates seamlessly with your LIS and EHR to identify, code, and track pathology-related risk conditions, aligning pathology with value-based care incentives.

  • Compliance, Audits & Denials: Are You Audit-Ready?

The scariest phrase in revenue cycle today: payer audit.

From CMS RADV audits to private payer clawbacks, pathology is under the microscope. And if your documentation, modifiers, or LCD coverage aren’t airtight, you’re exposed.

Sound familiar?

  • You’re still reacting to denials – not tracking patterns.
  • Appeals are a scramble, not a strategy.
  • You’re not sure if you’re compliant with No Surprises Act or new NCCI edits.
  • You haven’t done a proactive audit in over 6 months.

Compliance isn’t a checkbox. It’s a daily discipline – especially in pathology, where coding and documentation must be bulletproof. 3Gen Consulting supports labs with real-time denial analytics, audit response prep, and compliance documentation support, so you’re never caught off guard.

Final Diagnosis

It’s time to ask: Is your current pathology RCM partner keeping up – or holding you back? Most generic medical billing companies lack the clinical knowledge and test-level nuance needed to optimize pathology revenue. That’s where 3Gen Consulting steps in – with pathology-trained billers, coders, and contracting experts who understand your lab like it’s their own.

Want to see what your pathology revenue cycle is really doing behind the scenes? Let 3Gen Consulting run a free pathology medical billing health check. No fluff. No obligation. Just data-backed insight from a pathology billing company that knows your specialty. Book Your RCM Checkup Today.

Emerging U.S. Regulatory and Payer Trends in Laboratory Revenue Cycle Management image

Emerging U.S. Regulatory and Payer Trends in Laboratory Revenue Cycle Management

U.S. clinical labs face mounting regulatory challenges and shifting payer dynamics that are fundamentally changing how laboratory revenue cycle management (RCM) must be handled. Staying ahead means mastering compliance, optimizing payor contracting, and modernizing medical billing for laboratories to protect revenue and reduce expensive denials. If you manage a clinical lab, you’ve likely experienced how yesterday’s billing strategies no longer deliver. To survive – and thrive – you need to rethink your approach.

Regulatory Trends Shaping Laboratory Revenue Cycle Management

The regulatory spotlight on clinical laboratories in the U.S. is intensifying. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and new federal mandates have made lab RCM

Mastering Payor Contracting A Physician's Guide to Financial Success

Mastering Payor Contracting: A Physician’s Guide to Financial Success

Physician practices face mounting financial pressures from rising operational costs, increasing claim denials, and complex reimbursement models. Strategic payor contracting is key to addressing these challenges as a foundation of physician practice revenue cycle management. 

Effective payor contract management requires a shift in perspective by revenue cycle leadership – seeing it as more than an administrative task, and instead, a strategic imperative that can enhance financial stability and resolve revenue challenges.

Understanding the Healthcare Payor Contracting Landscape

The first step in successful healthcare payor contracting is recognizing the diverse array of payor types [1]. Each commercial payor, UnitedHealthcare, Aetna, and Blue Cross Blue Shield, etc. differs significantly in their network restrictions, patient cost-sharing structures, and reimbursement methodologies. Medicare sets the benchmark for many reimbursement rates through its administrative pricing systems. Medicaid programs vary considerably by state, while workers compensation and Veterans Administration programs operate under their own unique rules and fee schedules. These public programs often influence commercial payor rates, making their structures important to understand even for practices with predominantly private insurance patients.

This complex dynamic creates a need for carefully planned payor contracting, but complexity is increasing in other ways. A growing segment of the market consists of self-funded employer plans governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) regulations. These plans frequently contract with Third-Party Administrators (TPAs) to handle claims processing. While these arrangements can offer physicians more negotiation flexibility than traditional insurance products, they require specific understanding of ERISA’s regulatory framework and the employer’s individual goals for their health plan.

Emerging models like Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) and Clinically Integrated Networks (CINs) represent an emerging future of value-based care contracting. These provider-led entities contract with multiple payors under arrangements that increasingly tie reimbursement to quality metrics and cost efficiency rather than pure service volume. Understanding these evolving models is becoming essential for practices looking to remain competitive in shifting reimbursement landscapes.

Decoding Contract Essentials

Navigating payor contracts requires careful attention to several key provisions that directly impact practice revenue and operations. Practices should pay particular attention to how often rates are updated and whether contracts include provisions for inflationary adjustments.

Claim submission and payment terms dictate the practice’s cash flow cycle, making them critical to financial planning. These sections typically outline timely filing limits (usually 90-180 days from service date), definitions of what constitutes a “clean claim,” required payment timeframes (often 30-45 days from receipt), and any interest penalties for late payments. With increasing emphasis on electronic transactions, contracts may also specify requirements for electronic funds transfer (EFT) and claim submission protocols.

Medical necessity and authorization provisions establish the rules governing coverage determinations and prior approval requirements. These sections detail the process for obtaining pre-authorizations, the payer’s right to retroactively deny claims, and the practice’s appeal rights for disputed determinations. Particularly important are any clauses regarding “clinically unwarranted” services, which some payers use to deny payment even for medically necessary care if they determine it wasn’t warranted for that specific patient.

Value-Based Care Is Increasing Complexity in Payor Contracting

The transition to value-based care has transformed healthcare payor contracting, introducing new complexities and requiring practices to develop additional capabilities. 

Pay-for-performance models, now common in many contracts, typically withhold a percentage of payments (5-20%) contingent on meeting specified quality targets [2]. These arrangements may measure performance using Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) measures, patient satisfaction scores, or other quality indicators, and increasingly incorporate two-sided risks where practices may face financial penalties for missing targets.

Bundled payment arrangements present different challenges, providing a single payment for all services related to an episode of care. These models require careful coordination among providers and often include retrospective reconciliation processes that can significantly impact final payments. Practices need robust systems to track all services included in bundles and ensure proper attribution.

Build an Effective Contract Management Strategy

Implementing strong healthcare payor contract management processes requires moving beyond reactive approaches to develop a proactive, strategic system. A centralized contract repository serves as the foundation. Regular performance reviews transform contracts from static documents into useful resources for financial management. These reviews should analyze each contract’s actual performance compared to expectations. Identifying underperforming contracts early allows time for corrective action before renewal negotiations.

Strategic contract renewals should involve advance preparation, ideally beginning 6-12 months before contract expiration. This process should include benchmarking rates against local market data, identifying specific pain points in current terms, and preparing utilization data to support requests for rate increases. Practices that wait until the last minute can lose significant negotiating leverage.

Investing in staff education ensures all team members understand contract terms and their operational implications. This includes regular training sessions, creation of quick-reference guides for common scenarios, and establishing clear escalation paths for questions. Cross-training staff on multiple payor requirements builds organizational resilience against staff turnover.

The Path Forward

As healthcare payor contracting grows increasingly complex, physician practices must elevate their approach from basic administration to strategic financial management. For many practices, developing this level of expertise internally presents significant challenges. Partnering with vendors experienced in payor contracting can connect you with critical knowledge and resources. To discuss how 3Gen Consulting can serve your needs as a partner in payor contracting, contact us today.

References
[1] AMA, “Payor Contracting 101,” 2021. Available: https://www.ama-assn.org/system/files/payor-contracting-toolkit.pdf.
[2] L. Strazewski, “How value-based care is making payor contracts even more complex,” American Medical Association, 21 March 2022. Available: https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/private-practices/how-value-based-care-making-payor-contracts-even-more-complex.

The No Surprises Act Is in Jeopardy, But Providers Should Stay the Course Image

The No Surprises Act Is in Jeopardy, But Providers Should Stay the Course

Recent federal layoffs have added a new layer of uncertainty for providers impacted by the No Surprises Act. 

The federal office responsible for implementing this critical legislation faces staffing cuts, so revenue cycle leaders must stay proactive to mitigate the impact of surprise billing on their organizations. While the future of surprise billing legislation may be in limbo, providers can take actionable steps to strengthen their revenue cycle operations, including leveraging medical billing services and partnering with the best medical billing company in the USA to support compliance

Get In Touch!
close slider

    Get In Touch!