2025 CPT Code Updates for Anesthesia Billing- Fascial Plane Blocks, Modifiers & More Image

2025 CPT Code Updates for Anesthesia Billing: Fascial Plane Blocks, Modifiers & More

Anesthesia billing is increasing in complexity, and healthcare revenue cycle leaders should be ready to make adjustments to their billing, training, and compliance strategies. 

The anesthesia revenue cycle has received recent updates, so we’ve summarized those in the context of anesthesia billing as a whole. This article will walk you through updates to fascial plane block CPT codes as well as training options for your leadership and staff who want to stay on top of changes to anesthesia billing services. 

The Basics of Anesthesia Billing

Anesthesia revenue cycle management is uniquely complex [1]. Unlike standard medical billing, it works from a precise formula – base units + time units × conversion factor. 

Each anesthesia CPT code corresponds to a surgical procedure family and carries predetermined base units. Time units, which are calculated by anesthesia duration, vary by payer. Medicare calculates to one decimal (e.g., 129 minutes = 8.6 units), while some commercial payers round up (e.g., 9 units). For example, a total knee arthroplasty (CPT code 27447) crosswalks to anesthesia code 01402 (7 base units). With 129 minutes of anesthesia time, Medicare bills 15.6 units (7 + 8.6), while a commercial payer might bill 16 units (7 + 9). The result is a measurable financial impact. Medicare’s 2022 conversion factor ($21.5623) translates to $336.37, whereas a median commercial factor ($78.00) generates $1,216.80.

Staffing modifiers also complicate reimbursement. Medicare requires that payment be allocated between anesthesiologists and CRNAs. This split breaks down differently depending on the modifier, for example:

  • Personally performed (AA): 100% to physician
  • Medical direction of nonphysician anesthetist (QK/QY or QX): 50/50 split
  • CRNA service without medical direction (QZ): 100% to nonphysician

Commercial payers often do not follow modifiers, instead paying a single clinician. This misapplication increases the risk of underpayment or denials – making anesthesia billing services a critical investment.

Additionally, separately billable procedures (e.g., arterial lines, nerve blocks) should not be bundled into anesthesia payments. Payer contracts should explicitly exclude this type of bundling. For example, a post-operative femoral nerve block (CPT code 64447) should be billed separately. Working with an experienced anesthesia billing company improves the chances that this type of nuance is reflected in your payer contracting.

2025 CPT Code Updates for Anesthesia Billing

The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) has successfully advocated for the creation of new fascial plane block CPT codes [2]. These take effect in January 2025. We encourage you to review the original announcement from the ASA for details and accuracy. 

The updates reflect the growing adoption of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia techniques. They also aim to support proper reimbursement for anesthesiologists providing advanced pain management services. The changes establish dedicated codes for thoracic and lower extremity fascial plane blocks while clarifying the application of existing abdominal block codes.

Thoracic Fascial Plane Blocks (64466–64469)
In an effort to move away from the frequent use of unlisted CPT code 64999, the 2025 updates have introduced four dedicated codes for thoracic fascial plane blocks. These procedures, which previously lacked specific coding guidance, now have clearer pathways for billing and documentation. These address procedures including:

  • Erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks
  • Serratus anterior plane blocks
  • Parasternal intercostal blocks
  • Pectoserratus (PECS) blocks

These codes distinguish between single-injection (CPT code 64466 and CPT code 64468) and continuous infusion (CPT code 64467 and CPT code 64469) techniques, with imaging guidance included when performed. The codes apply only when the injection site is within the thoracic fascial plane. ESP blocks administered in the lumbar region, for example, should still be reported with the unlisted code 64999, since a dedicated lumbar code does not exist.

Lower Extremity Fascial Plane Blocks (64473–64474)
For lower extremity pain management, two new codes cover:

  • Fascia iliaca blocks
  • PENG (pericapsular nerve group) blocks
  • IPACK (infiltration between the popliteal artery and knee capsule) blocks

CPT code 64473 applies to single-injection blocks, while CPT code 64474 covers continuous infusions. Both include imaging guidance. Bilateral procedures require modifier -50 or separate line-item billing, depending on payer preferences.

Clarifications to Abdominal Fascial Plane Blocks (64486–64489)
While the descriptors for existing abdominal codes remain unchanged, the 2025 CPT manual now explicitly outlines that codes 64486–64489 encompass all abdominal fascial plane blocks, including:

  • Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks
  • Rectus sheath blocks
  • Quadratus lumborum blocks
  • External oblique intercostal blocks

Financial Impact and RVU Values
The new codes introduced in the 2025 CPT updates carry varying RVUs. Continuous infusion blocks are generally reimbursed at higher rates (e.g., 1.74 RVUs for CPT code 64467 vs. 1.50 for CPT code 64466). 

These values are based on the 2025 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule and may vary slightly by geographic region due to GPCI adjustments.

Proper utilization of these codes, particularly for continuous catheters, can significantly enhance revenue for practices offering advanced regional anesthesia services.

Training: Bridging Knowledge Gaps for Optimal Billing

The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) is offering a 1.0 CME/CEU webinar to master these changes [3]. Designed for coders, pain physicians, and revenue cycle leaders, it covers:

  1. Rationale for new FPB codes
  2. How to best apply the new FPB codes for lower extremity and thoracic regions
  3. Documentation, compliance, and anesthesia billing best practices

Outsourcing Anesthesia Billing

Outsourcing anesthesia billing requires careful evaluation to make sure your revenue cycle remains both efficient and compliant. Look for a vendor who demonstrates deep specialization in anesthesia revenue cycle management, not just general medical billing expertise. Prioritize partners who demonstrate that they stay current with evolving requirements, such as the 2025 fascial plane block codes.

At 3Gen Consulting, we offer end-to-end anesthesia billing services tailored to meet the demands of today’s evolving RCM landscape. Providers across the U.S. turn to our anesthesia medical billing experts to improve accuracy, reduce denials, and capture every dollar earned. Whether you’re optimizing financial performance or looking for a partner who can ensure compliance, we’re here to help.

References

[1] American Society of Anesthesiologists, “Anesthesia Payment Basics Series: #3 Payment, Conversion Factors, Modifiers,” December 2022. Available: https://www.asahq.org/quality-and-practice-management/managing-your-practice/timely-topics-in-payment-and-practice-management/anesthesia-payment-basics-series-3-payment-conversion-factors-modifiers.
[2] American Society of Anesthesiologists, “New and Updated Fascial Plane Block CPT Codes,” 23 June 2025. Available: https://www.asahq.org/quality-and-practice-management/managing-your-practice/timely-topics-in-payment-and-practice-management/2025-updated-fascial-plane-block-cpt-codes.
[3] American Society of Anesthesiologists, “Training on the New Fascial Plane Block CPT Codes,” 1 January 2025. Available: e024fc00w00.

July 2025 Newsletter

We’ve assembled the latest news for healthcare revenue cycle leaders to help you stay on top of industry challenges and adapt your revenue cycle management services to the challenges of USA medical billing.

CMS Releases Hospital OPPS July Update

CMS has released the July 2025 update for the Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System. It impacts hospital billing, physicians, home health agencies, hospices, and other providers billing MACs for

Study Supports New Codes in Radiology Billing to Support Uncompensated Work Image

Study Supports New Codes in Radiology Billing to Support Uncompensated Work

The nature of radiology billing services could soon be changing. 

As radiology medical billing stands now, revenue cycle processes don’t accurately reflect the extensive work they do outside of image interpretation. These tasks can take up anywhere from 35% to 60% of their time. They can include work like consultations for their colleagues or traveling to attend conferences to review cases with professionals from other specialties. 

But a recent study from Yale School of Medicine examines this dynamic, looking at gaps in billing for services performed by radiologists and making recommendations to close gaps in radiology medical coding and billing [1]. Revenue cycle leaders who bill for radiology services should consider reviewing this study and the recommendations to better understand the challenges your clinicians face and the changes that could soon be coming to radiology medical billing. 

The Complexities of Radiology Billing Services

Radiology billing requires significant attention to detail because of the nature of imaging procedures.

Billers and coders must properly capture charges for X-rays, CT scans, and MRIs. Services like interventional radiology require precise coding with appropriate modifiers to avoid denials and delays in payment. One thing that sets radiology medical billing apart is the separation between the professional component (physician interpretation) and the technical component (equipment and staff). When a single entity provides both, a global charge applies, but in hospitals, split billing is common since radiologists bill separately for interpretations. 

Compliance is also a challenge in radiology billing. It is complicated by supervision requirements, payer-specific policies, and the need for thorough documentation, which must align to avoid denials. High-cost imaging also demands rigorous validation to support medical necessity. Revenue cycle leaders must invest the time and training in their staff to achieve these fundamentals. Without them, the risk of revenue leakage increases, making expertise in radiology medical coding indispensable.

The Hidden Workload: Unbilled Consultations in Radiology

Uncompensated efforts from radiologists should be a concern for healthcare leaders. 

These differences can impact patient care, but unfortunately, current contract and billing structures aren’t set up to capture their efforts or generate reimbursement. Even electronic consultation codes for interprofessional calls or assessment and management services that occur through the electronic health record (EHR) which could serve as a temporary solution, are underutilized due to documentation hurdles. 

According to the study authors, “such codes could theoretically provide a means of billing consultative work by radiologists, though there are practical barriers to use. Billing requires documentation of patient consent, which would likely need to be performed by the requesting physician in the case of ad hoc radiology consultation. These codes are [generally] reimbursed at lower RVU per unit time than E&M codes (as well as pathology consultation codes), which may not provide sufficient incentive for practices to implement new workflows, unless streamlined documentation and billing mechanisms can be put in place.”

The absence of structured billing processes for these services creates a financial gap, forcing providers to absorb the cost of unreimbursed labor. As radiology billing evolves, the demand for consultative roles will only grow. This inevitable growth makes it critical for leaders in radiology billing services to advocate for solutions that reflect the full scope of their radiologists’ contributions.

Burnout in Radiologists Is a Pressing Issue

The hidden workload of radiologists should be a priority for healthcare leaders, largely because of their risk of burnout. 

Burnout in radiologists often shows up as exhaustion, cynicism, and diminished self-worth. It’s also reached critical levels. 65% of female and 44% of male radiologists report that they feel burned out or both burned out and depressed. Even though physician burnout rates have stabilized some in recent years, 71% of affected radiologists have endured it for more than 13 months [2].

Burnout is associated with higher rates of turnover, reduced productivity, and an increase in medical errors – issues that cost health systems millions in recruitment and lost revenue. The American Association of Medical Colleges (AAMC) warns that radiology can’t afford to lose any more talent, since the specialty is already dealing with imaging overuse, stagnant residency slots, and the “silver tsunami” of aging Boomers. 

Closing the Gap: Strategies for Fair Compensation

To address these inefficiencies, Yale researchers propose a few solutions. One is dedicated CPT codes similar to those in pathology. These could account for ad-hoc and multidisciplinary consultations. Another is negotiating hospital contracts to include stipends for noninterpretive work or implementing academic RVU models to track unbilled hours for individual radiologists.  

Health systems can benefit from long-term incentives for consultations, especially as AI is used to streamline routine interpretations and free radiologists up for more complex case discussions. 

Academic and referral centers could benefit the most from restructured reimbursement models since consultative work is most prevalent in these organizations. 

Get in Front of Changes in Radiology Billing Services

As more professionals rethink this area of the healthcare revenue cycle, expect to see changes in radiology billing and even growing opportunities to improve reimbursement. These changes will have reverberating effects across your organization and aren’t something providers should try to navigate alone. 

We invite you to learn more about how 3Gen Consulting can support you in your radiology billing strategy and to contact us to learn more about the range of options you have in leveraging our expertise. Start your journey to improvements in your revenue cycle strategy here.

 

References

[1] S. Iftikhar, S. Rahmani, O. A. Zaree, A. Kertam, T. Farquhar and L. H. Tu, “The Value of Radiology Consultation: Effort Allocation, Clinical Impact, and Untapped Opportunities,” Journal of the American College of Radiology, 7 April 2025.
[2] C. E. Hudnall, “Burnout Fueling Workforce Woes,” 3 July 2024. Available: https://www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Publications-and-Research/ACR-Bulletin/Burnout-Fueling-Workforce-Woes.

Medical Coding Audits 101- How Physicians Can Stay Ahead of the Curve image

Medical Coding Audits 101: How Physicians Can Stay Ahead of the Curve

You’re wrapping up a 10-hour shift. One more note to finish, one last patient to call – and then someone from billing walks in and says, “We’ve been selected for a medical coding audit.”

Cue the internal screaming.

Whether you’re running a private practice, part of a multispecialty group, or just trying to stay ahead in today’s value-based care environment, medical coding audits are the healthcare equivalent of a pop quiz —

Emerging U.S. Regulatory and Payer Trends in Laboratory Revenue Cycle Management image

Emerging U.S. Regulatory and Payer Trends in Laboratory Revenue Cycle Management

U.S. clinical labs face mounting regulatory challenges and shifting payer dynamics that are fundamentally changing how laboratory revenue cycle management (RCM) must be handled. Staying ahead means mastering compliance, optimizing payor contracting, and modernizing medical billing for laboratories to protect revenue and reduce expensive denials. If you manage a clinical lab, you’ve likely experienced how yesterday’s billing strategies no longer deliver. To survive – and thrive – you need to rethink your approach.

Regulatory Trends Shaping Laboratory Revenue Cycle Management

The regulatory spotlight on clinical laboratories in the U.S. is intensifying. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and new federal mandates have made lab RCM

Get In Touch!
close slider

    Get In Touch!